Netflix’s 2017 adaptation of Stephen King’s novella, *1922*, isn’t your typical popcorn flick. It’s a slow-burn descent into madness, a chilling tale of guilt and paranoia set against the backdrop of rural Nebraska during the early 20th century. Forget jump scares; this film relies on the creeping dread of a man unraveling under the weight of his own terrible secret.
The plot centers around Wilfred James, a Nebraska farmer deeply unhappy in his marriage to Arlette. Driven by greed and a desire for a simpler life (and maybe a little less nagging), Wilfred convinces his son, Henry, to help him murder Arlette. What follows is a nightmarish spiral of guilt, delusion, and increasingly bizarre events, as Wilfred’s actions have far-reaching and horrifying consequences. The film masterfully portrays the psychological toll of his crime, highlighting the insidious nature of guilt and the fragility of the human psyche.
The film is set in Nebraska during the 1920s, a period of significant change in American agriculture. The post-World War I era saw a boom in farm production, followed by a sharp decline in crop prices, leading to widespread economic hardship for farmers. This economic instability, coupled with the isolation of rural life, created a fertile ground for desperation and resentment, perfectly mirroring the psychological state of Wilfred. The film subtly depicts the harsh realities of rural life during this period – the backbreaking labor, the unforgiving land, and the sense of isolation that permeated the communities. The stark landscapes and dilapidated farmhouses visually reflect the economic struggles and the oppressive atmosphere of the time.
*1922* doesn’t shy away from exploring the patriarchal norms of the time. Wilfred’s actions are partly fueled by his resentment towards his wife and his desire to control his own destiny, reflecting the limited opportunities and societal expectations placed on women during that era. The film also touches upon the societal pressures faced by farmers, the stigma surrounding mental illness, and the isolation of rural communities, all of which contribute to the overall sense of unease and despair. The film’s depiction of rural Nebraska is less romanticized and more realistic, showing the hardships and struggles of daily life.
Wilfred James is the film’s protagonist, or perhaps more accurately, its anti-hero. He’s a man consumed by greed and self-interest, whose actions have devastating consequences. His relationship with his wife, Arlette, is strained and unhappy, fueled by mutual resentment and a lack of communication. Their son, Henry, is a more passive character, initially manipulated by his father but ultimately burdened by the weight of his involvement in the crime. The film effectively portrays the complex and often destructive dynamics between these characters, highlighting the impact of their actions on each other and on their lives. The rat infestation, a recurring motif throughout the film, serves as a potent symbol of the decay and corruption that permeates Wilfred’s life and his increasingly fractured mind.
1922, Netflix’s adaptation of Stephen King’s novella, isn’t your typical Hollywood blockbuster; it opts for a slow burn, a creeping dread that mirrors the psychological deterioration of its protagonist. This deliberate pacing is perfectly complemented by the film’s masterful use of cinematic techniques, creating a truly unsettling viewing experience. The film’s stylistic choices aren’t flashy, but they’re incredibly effective in building suspense and reflecting the grim, decaying world of the story.
The cinematography in 1922 plays a crucial role in establishing the film’s oppressive atmosphere. The frequent use of low-angle shots, particularly when focusing on the vast, seemingly endless fields of Nebraska, emphasizes the overwhelming sense of isolation and the protagonist’s growing insignificance against the backdrop of nature’s indifference. Conversely, close-ups on Wilfred’s increasingly haunted face amplify his internal turmoil and growing paranoia. The use of long, unbroken takes, coupled with the muted color palette, further enhances the film’s sense of claustrophobia and impending doom, even in wide shots. The camera often lingers on details – a decaying barn, a splattered piece of blood – highlighting the pervasiveness of decay and the irreversible nature of Wilfred’s actions.
The cinematography of 1922 isn’t about flashy camera movements or stylistic flourishes; it’s about precision and deliberate pacing. The director utilizes long takes to immerse the viewer in the character’s perspective, allowing the unsettling atmosphere to gradually build. For instance, a scene depicting Wilfred’s increasingly erratic behavior features a long, unbroken take that follows him as he nervously paces his home, the camera slowly circling him, mirroring his spiraling mental state. This technique effectively communicates Wilfred’s internal conflict without relying on dialogue or exposition. The film masterfully uses the camera to subtly show, rather than tell, the story’s descent into madness.
The editing style of 1922 complements the slow-burn narrative perfectly. The film eschews rapid cuts and jarring transitions, opting instead for a more deliberate, measured approach. This deliberate pacing mirrors the slow decay of Wilfred’s mental state and the gradual unraveling of his life. The use of slow dissolves and fades between scenes reinforces the feeling of time passing slowly, allowing the viewer to fully absorb the grim reality of Wilfred’s situation. The editing is almost invisible, yet it is incredibly effective in controlling the rhythm and pacing of the narrative, building tension without resorting to cheap thrills.
Lighting plays a crucial role in establishing the film’s dark and unsettling mood. The film frequently utilizes natural light, often casting long, dramatic shadows that add to the overall sense of unease. The muted color palette, dominated by browns, grays, and muted greens, reflects the decaying state of both the farm and Wilfred’s mental state. The absence of bright, vibrant colors contributes to the film’s overall somber and depressing tone, further emphasizing the grim reality of the situation. Even in daylight scenes, a pervasive gloom hangs over the landscape, reflecting the protagonist’s inner darkness.
Thomas Jane’s performance as Wilfred James is nothing short of remarkable. He embodies the character’s descent into madness with a chilling realism, conveying a gradual erosion of sanity through subtle shifts in his demeanor and expressions. The supporting cast also delivers strong performances, adding depth and complexity to the narrative. The actors’ commitment to their roles, coupled with the film’s subdued style, creates a palpable sense of tension and unease, making the film truly captivating and disturbing. The subtle nuances in their performances, especially the gradual shift in expressions and body language, effectively portray the psychological torment of the characters and the unsettling nature of the events unfolding.